Allmand 25 CC vs Lowe FS 1900: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand 25 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Allmand 25 CC comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Lowe FS 1900. Over the first five years the Allmand 25 CC loses roughly $7,988 while the Lowe FS 1900 loses about $10,347 — a gap near $2,359.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand 25 CC sheds about 5% in year one versus 14% for the Lowe FS 1900. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…