Allmand Monster 32 CC vs Sea Hunt Ultra 275 SE CC: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand Monster 32 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Allmand Monster 32 CC comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 275 SE CC. Over the first five years the Allmand Monster 32 CC loses roughly $26,049 while the Sea Hunt Ultra 275 SE CC loses about $79,603 — a gap near $53,554.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand Monster 32 CC sheds about 7% in year one versus 32% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 275 SE CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…