Aluma Weld Xpress 1650HI vs Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LO: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress 1650HI holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650HI comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LO. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650HI loses roughly $1,932 while the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LO loses about $1,932 — a gap near $0.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650HI sheds about 9% in year one versus 9% for the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…