Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LWLO vs Lund WC 16: 5-year value retention (63% vs 62%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LWLO holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LWLO comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 62% for the Lund WC 16. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LWLO loses roughly $1,946 while the Lund WC 16 loses about $2,768 — a gap near $822.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress 1650LWLO sheds about 9% in year one versus 22% for the Lund WC 16. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…