Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D vs Aluma Weld Xpress XP180 BS — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D vs Aluma Weld Xpress XP180 BS: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Aluma Weld Xpress XP180 BS. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D loses roughly $1,776 while the Aluma Weld Xpress XP180 BS loses about $6,841 — a gap near $5,065.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D sheds about 8% in year one versus 21% for the Aluma Weld Xpress XP180 BS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…