Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS vs Mitzi Skiffs 16 Tiller FO: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Tiller FO. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS loses roughly $8,288 while the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Tiller FO loses about $4,360 — a gap near $-3928.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 18% for the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Tiller FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…