Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS vs SeaArk 1860SLD: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the SeaArk 1860SLD. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS loses roughly $8,288 while the SeaArk 1860SLD loses about $3,438 — a gap near $-4850.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress Skiff 185 Sltwtr TR BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 15% for the SeaArk 1860SLD. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…