Aluma Weld Xpress SW20B Xtrm Marsh PK BS vs Starcraft Superfisherman 186: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress SW20B Xtrm Marsh PK BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress SW20B Xtrm Marsh PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Starcraft Superfisherman 186. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress SW20B Xtrm Marsh PK BS loses roughly $12,462 while the Starcraft Superfisherman 186 loses about $11,408 — a gap near $-1054.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress SW20B Xtrm Marsh PK BS sheds about 22% in year one versus 21% for the Starcraft Superfisherman 186. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…