Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Ctfsh Bass PK BS vs Lowe 1760: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 1760 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe 1760 comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Ctfsh Bass PK BS. Over the first five years the Lowe 1760 loses roughly $5,797 while the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Ctfsh Bass PK BS loses about $8,509 — a gap near $2,712.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 1760 sheds about 16% in year one versus 21% for the Aluma Weld Xpress XP185 Ctfsh Bass PK BS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…