Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS vs Lund 1650 Angler SS — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS vs Lund 1650 Angler SS: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1650 Angler SS. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS loses roughly $7,220 while the Lund 1650 Angler SS loses about $8,923 — a gap near $1,703.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP18CC XTR Bay Stnl BS sheds about 22% in year one versus 23% for the Lund 1650 Angler SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…