Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS vs Scout 195 Sportfish Sprt Pkg CC — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS vs Scout 195 Sportfish Sprt Pkg CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Scout 195 Sportfish Sprt Pkg CC. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS loses roughly $8,890 while the Scout 195 Sportfish Sprt Pkg CC loses about $12,692 — a gap near $3,802.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP200 Ctfsh Bass PK BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 24% for the Scout 195 Sportfish Sprt Pkg CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…