Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS vs Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS vs Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS loses roughly $7,859 while the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport loses about $4,660 — a gap near $-3199.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress XP20CC Bay Stnls PK BS sheds about 21% in year one versus 10% for the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…