Alumacraft Classic 165 CS vs Lund 1875 Pro V Sport: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Classic 165 CS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS loses roughly $4,137 while the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport loses about $23,469 — a gap near $19,332.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Classic 165 CS sheds about 10% in year one versus 19% for the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…