Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller vs Alweld 1752VV Marsh LF Package: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Alweld 1752VV Marsh LF Package. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller loses roughly $3,880 while the Alweld 1752VV Marsh LF Package loses about $2,086 — a gap near $-1794.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Classic 165 Tiller sheds about 10% in year one versus 22% for the Alweld 1752VV Marsh LF Package. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…