Alumacraft Competitor 185 CS vs SeaArk RXJT170 SC: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 185 CS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 185 CS comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the SeaArk RXJT170 SC. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 185 CS loses roughly $5,673 while the SeaArk RXJT170 SC loses about $3,204 — a gap near $-2469.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 185 CS sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk RXJT170 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…