Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport vs SeaArk BX 220 — Depreciation Comparison

Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport vs SeaArk BX 220: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the SeaArk BX 220. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport loses roughly $6,110 while the SeaArk BX 220 loses about $8,286 — a gap near $2,176.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Sport sheds about 8% in year one versus 12% for the SeaArk BX 220. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…