Alumacraft Competitor 185 Tiller vs Dusky 33 Fishermans Cuddy Twin: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 185 Tiller holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Tiller comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the Dusky 33 Fishermans Cuddy Twin. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Tiller loses roughly $5,304 while the Dusky 33 Fishermans Cuddy Twin loses about $45,325 — a gap near $40,021.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 185 Tiller sheds about 8% in year one versus 21% for the Dusky 33 Fishermans Cuddy Twin. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…