Alumacraft Trophy 195 vs SeaArk RX160 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Alumacraft Trophy 195 vs SeaArk RX160 CC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Trophy 195 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Trophy 195 comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk RX160 CC. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Trophy 195 loses roughly $7,931 while the SeaArk RX160 CC loses about $2,570 — a gap near $-5361.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Trophy 195 sheds about 8% in year one versus 7% for the SeaArk RX160 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…