Alumaweld 22 vs Lowe Stinger 188: 5-year value retention (78% vs 78%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumaweld 22 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumaweld 22 comes out ahead, holding about 78% of its value versus 78% for the Lowe Stinger 188. Over the first five years the Alumaweld 22 loses roughly $10,781 while the Lowe Stinger 188 loses about $8,349 — a gap near $-2432.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumaweld 22 sheds about 15% in year one versus 15% for the Lowe Stinger 188. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…