Alweld 1442CJ vs Lund 1650 Angler Tiller — Depreciation Comparison

Alweld 1442CJ vs Lund 1650 Angler Tiller: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1442CJ holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alweld 1442CJ comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller. Over the first five years the Alweld 1442CJ loses roughly $1,857 while the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller loses about $8,720 — a gap near $6,863.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1442CJ sheds about 27% in year one versus 23% for the Lund 1650 Angler Tiller. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…