Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg vs Lund 1775 Crossover XS — Depreciation Comparison

Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg vs Lund 1775 Crossover XS: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Lund 1775 Crossover XS. Over the first five years the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg loses roughly $1,752 while the Lund 1775 Crossover XS loses about $16,567 — a gap near $14,815.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh CC Pkg sheds about 7% in year one versus 18% for the Lund 1775 Crossover XS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…