Alweld 1652 vs Lund 1675 Adventure Sport: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1652 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1652 comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 1675 Adventure Sport. Over the first five years the Alweld 1652 loses roughly $1,641 while the Lund 1675 Adventure Sport loses about $12,120 — a gap near $10,479.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1652 sheds about 22% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1675 Adventure Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…