Alweld 1652STK vs Polar Kraft 156 T: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1652STK holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1652STK comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the Polar Kraft 156 T. Over the first five years the Alweld 1652STK loses roughly $1,789 while the Polar Kraft 156 T loses about $2,794 — a gap near $1,005.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1652STK sheds about 23% in year one versus 5% for the Polar Kraft 156 T. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…