Alweld 1652VV Marsh Pro Package vs Lund SSV 18: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1652VV Marsh Pro Package holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1652VV Marsh Pro Package comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund SSV 18. Over the first five years the Alweld 1652VV Marsh Pro Package loses roughly $2,671 while the Lund SSV 18 loses about $3,846 — a gap near $1,175.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1652VV Marsh Pro Package sheds about 23% in year one versus 21% for the Lund SSV 18. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…