Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg vs Lowe FM 1775 WT: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Lowe FM 1775 WT. Over the first five years the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg loses roughly $2,780 while the Lowe FM 1775 WT loses about $8,718 — a gap near $5,938.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh Pro Pkg sheds about 22% in year one versus 14% for the Lowe FM 1775 WT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…