Alumacraft Competitor 175 Tiller vs Alweld 1752PF: 5-year value retention (75% vs 75%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1752PF holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1752PF comes out ahead, holding about 75% of its value versus 75% for the Alumacraft Competitor 175 Tiller. Over the first five years the Alweld 1752PF loses roughly $2,399 while the Alumacraft Competitor 175 Tiller loses about $4,878 — a gap near $2,479.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1752PF sheds about 18% in year one versus 8% for the Alumacraft Competitor 175 Tiller. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…