Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package vs Triton 179 TRX SC — Depreciation Comparison

Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package vs Triton 179 TRX SC: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Triton 179 TRX SC. Over the first five years the Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package loses roughly $2,677 while the Triton 179 TRX SC loses about $8,459 — a gap near $5,782.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1752VV Marsh Pro Package sheds about 22% in year one versus 6% for the Triton 179 TRX SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…