Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS vs Alweld 1760FV Mud: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Alweld 1760FV Mud. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS loses roughly $5,156 while the Alweld 1760FV Mud loses about $3,087 — a gap near $-2069.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Competitor 165 CS sheds about 10% in year one versus 10% for the Alweld 1760FV Mud. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…