Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 vs Arctic Cat Blast M 4000: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the Arctic Cat Blast M 4000. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 loses roughly $4,410 while the Arctic Cat Blast M 4000 loses about $4,322 — a gap near $-88.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 sheds about 15% in year one versus 15% for the Arctic Cat Blast M 4000. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…