Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 vs CFMoto 300SS — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 vs CFMoto 300SS: 5-year value retention (56% vs 56%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 comes out ahead, holding about 56% of its value versus 56% for the CFMoto 300SS. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 loses roughly $4,410 while the CFMoto 300SS loses about $2,033 — a gap near $-2377.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat Blast LT 4000 sheds about 15% in year one versus 21% for the CFMoto 300SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…