Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 vs Polaris 600 Pro RMK 155: 5-year value retention (60% vs 60%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 comes out ahead, holding about 60% of its value versus 60% for the Polaris 600 Pro RMK 155. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 loses roughly $2,752 while the Polaris 600 Pro RMK 155 loses about $4,982 — a gap near $2,230.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat LYNX 2000 sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the Polaris 600 Pro RMK 155. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…