Arctic Cat M 8000 MTN CAT AO 165 3 0 vs Yamaha Mountain MAX LE 165: 5-year value retention (57% vs 57%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat M 8000 MTN CAT AO 165 3 0 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat M 8000 MTN CAT AO 165 3 0 comes out ahead, holding about 57% of its value versus 57% for the Yamaha Mountain MAX LE 165. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat M 8000 MTN CAT AO 165 3 0 loses roughly $7,274 while the Yamaha Mountain MAX LE 165 loses about $7,058 — a gap near $-216.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat M 8000 MTN CAT AO 165 3 0 sheds about 13% in year one versus 11% for the Yamaha Mountain MAX LE 165. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…