Arctic Cat M8000 Hardore AO165 3 0ES vs Arctic Cat M8000 Mtncat AO 154 3 0ES: 5-year value retention (57% vs 57%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat M8000 Hardore AO165 3 0ES holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat M8000 Hardore AO165 3 0ES comes out ahead, holding about 57% of its value versus 57% for the Arctic Cat M8000 Mtncat AO 154 3 0ES. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat M8000 Hardore AO165 3 0ES loses roughly $7,448 while the Arctic Cat M8000 Mtncat AO 154 3 0ES loses about $7,361 — a gap near $-87.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat M8000 Hardore AO165 3 0ES sheds about 13% in year one versus 13% for the Arctic Cat M8000 Mtncat AO 154 3 0ES. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…