Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 vs Polaris 600 RMK 144 — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 vs Polaris 600 RMK 144: 5-year value retention (60% vs 60%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 comes out ahead, holding about 60% of its value versus 60% for the Polaris 600 RMK 144. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 loses roughly $4,280 while the Polaris 600 RMK 144 loses about $4,382 — a gap near $102.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat Pantera 3000 sheds about 8% in year one versus 8% for the Polaris 600 RMK 144. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…