Arctic Cat ZR 200 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE 2 TONE — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Cat ZR 200 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE 2 TONE: 5-year value retention (55% vs 55%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Cat ZR 200 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Cat ZR 200 comes out ahead, holding about 55% of its value versus 55% for the Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE 2 TONE. Over the first five years the Arctic Cat ZR 200 loses roughly $2,537 while the Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE 2 TONE loses about $7,738 — a gap near $5,201.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Cat ZR 200 sheds about 23% in year one versus 7% for the Triumph Scrambler 1200 XE 2 TONE. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…