Arctic Fox 22G vs Cedar Creek 377BH: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 22G holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 22G comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Cedar Creek 377BH. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 22G loses roughly $27,619 while the Cedar Creek 377BH loses about $59,567 — a gap near $31,948.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 22G sheds about 29% in year one versus 19% for the Cedar Creek 377BH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…