Arctic Fox 27 5L vs Cherokee By Forest River 27DBH — Depreciation Comparison

Arctic Fox 27 5L vs Cherokee By Forest River 27DBH: 5-year value retention (52% vs 52%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Arctic Fox 27 5L holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Arctic Fox 27 5L comes out ahead, holding about 52% of its value versus 52% for the Cherokee By Forest River 27DBH. Over the first five years the Arctic Fox 27 5L loses roughly $45,741 while the Cherokee By Forest River 27DBH loses about $21,115 — a gap near $-24626.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Arctic Fox 27 5L sheds about 34% in year one versus 13% for the Cherokee By Forest River 27DBH. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…