Aspen Trail 3210BHDS vs Shasta By Forest River 298RLS — Depreciation Comparison

Aspen Trail 3210BHDS vs Shasta By Forest River 298RLS: 5-year value retention (48% vs 48%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aspen Trail 3210BHDS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aspen Trail 3210BHDS comes out ahead, holding about 48% of its value versus 48% for the Shasta By Forest River 298RLS. Over the first five years the Aspen Trail 3210BHDS loses roughly $32,082 while the Shasta By Forest River 298RLS loses about $43,063 — a gap near $10,981.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aspen Trail 3210BHDS sheds about 11% in year one versus 32% for the Shasta By Forest River 298RLS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…