Avalon LSZ Carbon 2085 vs Crest 270 SLS Twin: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Avalon LSZ Carbon 2085 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Avalon LSZ Carbon 2085 comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Crest 270 SLS Twin. Over the first five years the Avalon LSZ Carbon 2085 loses roughly $7,227 while the Crest 270 SLS Twin loses about $57,696 — a gap near $50,469.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Avalon LSZ Carbon 2085 sheds about 8% in year one versus 17% for the Crest 270 SLS Twin. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…