Avalon LSZ RF 2285 vs Crest 220 SLC — Depreciation Comparison

Avalon LSZ RF 2285 vs Crest 220 SLC: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Avalon LSZ RF 2285 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Avalon LSZ RF 2285 comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Crest 220 SLC. Over the first five years the Avalon LSZ RF 2285 loses roughly $8,338 while the Crest 220 SLC loses about $15,843 — a gap near $7,505.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Avalon LSZ RF 2285 sheds about 7% in year one versus 16% for the Crest 220 SLC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…