Bayliner Element E16 vs Scarab 165 ID Convenience Pkg — Depreciation Comparison

Bayliner Element E16 vs Scarab 165 ID Convenience Pkg: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Bayliner Element E16 holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Bayliner Element E16 comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Scarab 165 ID Convenience Pkg. Over the first five years the Bayliner Element E16 loses roughly $7,266 while the Scarab 165 ID Convenience Pkg loses about $11,863 — a gap near $4,597.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Bayliner Element E16 sheds about 8% in year one versus 10% for the Scarab 165 ID Convenience Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…