Berkshire 22RFC CTS vs Harris SL 250 Twin Engine — Depreciation Comparison

Berkshire 22RFC CTS vs Harris SL 250 Twin Engine: 5-year value retention (54% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Berkshire 22RFC CTS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Berkshire 22RFC CTS comes out ahead, holding about 54% of its value versus 53% for the Harris SL 250 Twin Engine. Over the first five years the Berkshire 22RFC CTS loses roughly $16,150 while the Harris SL 250 Twin Engine loses about $157,999 — a gap near $141,849.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Berkshire 22RFC CTS sheds about 29% in year one versus 15% for the Harris SL 250 Twin Engine. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…