Bison 8313BS 3 Horse vs Bison 8313GS 3 Horse — Depreciation Comparison

Bison 8313BS 3 Horse vs Bison 8313GS 3 Horse: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Bison 8313BS 3 Horse holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Bison 8313BS 3 Horse comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Bison 8313GS 3 Horse. Over the first five years the Bison 8313BS 3 Horse loses roughly $17,634 while the Bison 8313GS 3 Horse loses about $17,634 — a gap near $0.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Bison 8313BS 3 Horse sheds about 16% in year one versus 16% for the Bison 8313GS 3 Horse. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…