Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R vs Polaris RZR Pro XP Ultimate — Depreciation Comparison

Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R vs Polaris RZR Pro XP Ultimate: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Polaris RZR Pro XP Ultimate. Over the first five years the Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R loses roughly $9,050 while the Polaris RZR Pro XP Ultimate loses about $12,342 — a gap near $3,292.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Can-Am Commander MAX XT 1000R sheds about 4% in year one versus 7% for the Polaris RZR Pro XP Ultimate. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…