Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo vs Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS — Depreciation Comparison

Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo vs Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo. Over the first five years the Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS loses roughly $4,662 while the Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo loses about $6,941 — a gap near $2,279.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polaris Ranger 1000 EPS sheds about 2% in year one versus 6% for the Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…