Can-Am Spyder F3 T vs Polaris Slingshot SLR: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polaris Slingshot SLR holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polaris Slingshot SLR comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the Can-Am Spyder F3 T. Over the first five years the Polaris Slingshot SLR loses roughly $8,353 while the Can-Am Spyder F3 T loses about $6,994 — a gap near $-1359.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polaris Slingshot SLR sheds about 12% in year one versus 11% for the Can-Am Spyder F3 T. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…