Charger 196 Vmag vs Charger 2010 Vmag: 5-year value retention (65% vs 65%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Charger 196 Vmag holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Charger 196 Vmag comes out ahead, holding about 65% of its value versus 65% for the Charger 2010 Vmag. Over the first five years the Charger 196 Vmag loses roughly $16,194 while the Charger 2010 Vmag loses about $19,302 — a gap near $3,108.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Charger 196 Vmag sheds about 14% in year one versus 15% for the Charger 2010 Vmag. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…