Charger BC 2000 RG vs Sunchaser 22 LR — Depreciation Comparison

Charger BC 2000 RG vs Sunchaser 22 LR: 5-year value retention (62% vs 62%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Charger BC 2000 RG holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Charger BC 2000 RG comes out ahead, holding about 62% of its value versus 62% for the Sunchaser 22 LR. Over the first five years the Charger BC 2000 RG loses roughly $15,212 while the Sunchaser 22 LR loses about $11,525 — a gap near $-3687.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Charger BC 2000 RG sheds about 16% in year one versus 31% for the Sunchaser 22 LR. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…