Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT vs Keystone Rv 26 Rbpr — Depreciation Comparison

Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT vs Keystone Rv 26 Rbpr: 5-year value retention (50% vs 50%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT comes out ahead, holding about 50% of its value versus 50% for the Keystone Rv 26 Rbpr. Over the first five years the Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT loses roughly $23,950 while the Keystone Rv 26 Rbpr loses about $31,074 — a gap near $7,124.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coachmen By Forest River 27 LT sheds about 17% in year one versus 14% for the Keystone Rv 26 Rbpr. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…