Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ vs Ozark 1650BHK — Depreciation Comparison

Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ vs Ozark 1650BHK: 5-year value retention (51% vs 51%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ comes out ahead, holding about 51% of its value versus 51% for the Ozark 1650BHK. Over the first five years the Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ loses roughly $26,820 while the Ozark 1650BHK loses about $17,371 — a gap near $-9449.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Coleman By Dutchmen 300TQ sheds about 8% in year one versus 23% for the Ozark 1650BHK. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…